Post by timeforcered on Apr 16, 2005 18:18:11 GMT -5
Er zijn weer wat aflevering-titels bekend!
Het is nog niet bekend welke aflevering-nummers ze zijn.
- Recognition
- Swat, Part 1
- Swat, Part 2
Van Bruce Kalish zelf uit een interview met hem, over wat zijn favoriete afleveringen zijn:
Op de vraag of Wes Sky's vader is, zei hij:
Geen info dus.
En...
En daar is dus het antwoord op de vraag over de mixes van oude monsters en Rangers.
Nods naar de fans, yeah right...
www.rangerboard.com/showthread.php?t=58614
Het is nog niet bekend welke aflevering-nummers ze zijn.
- Recognition
- Swat, Part 1
- Swat, Part 2
Van Bruce Kalish zelf uit een interview met hem, over wat zijn favoriete afleveringen zijn:
BK: BEGINNINGS 1 and 2 were awesome for us. It set the bar. Then IDOL. SHADOW 1 and 2 are great. RECOGNITION is amazing. The Roshomon episode is great. Swat 1 and 2 are good. And the last two parter is just HUGE!
HJU: Is Skyler Tate's father Wes Collins?
BK: We're waiting for the DNA tests to come back.
BK: We're waiting for the DNA tests to come back.
En...
HJU: One of the things fans are loving most about this show are its
slight nods to continuity, that have exploded in a lot of speculation.
Whose ideas have it been to use Andros's cloak, to mention KO-35, and
the use of Wes Collin's TimeRed costume?
BK: Most of the tributes to the past come from Koichi and most of all Jackie Marchand. I do not attempt to know anywhere close to what they know. I support their interest in the franchise and let it unfold in the series as long as it works into our arc. So when it comes to these things, I do what any successful Executive does... Get out of the way.
HJU: We've noticed a lot of prop re-use over in S.P.D., so far. The
Blue Senturion, Space Ranger helmets, Deviot, Red Time Force Ranger
and etc. While some fans certainly appreciate these as nods to PR's
past. Others are growing concerned that these props are being re-used
carelessly and may ultimately damage the rich continuity that many
longtime fans remain very passionate about.
So my question is, when doing things like having a man dressed in a
cloak and wielding drill-esque weapon. (Both signatures of Red Space
Ranger Andros one of the most popular Rangers that isn't from the
original series.) Are they done with acknowledgement of the past in
mind and intended as treats for longtime fans? Or are they simply
convenient cost-cutting measures and fanboys need to go get a life?
BK: The truth or a lie? The lie... YES! We painstakingly layer in all references to the past to satisfy the true PR fans.
The truth: It's a little of both. Both Jackie and Koichi are very respectful of the past and acknowledgement there of... Some of the props and costumes are added in with intention of the tribute to past PR years. And we operate on such a low budget that some props are recycled. If we were to start fresh every year you would not like what we could deliver for the budget. Some recycling is mandatory. We try to populate the S.P.D, world with a rich look. Rich looks cost money. Greg and I were amazed at the CSI-type work you fans do to every frame of PR. We did not realize that something shown only shortly 7 years ago would be recognized. So, no apologies from this office. We're trying to give you fans the best show possible. It's the hard facts but it is what it is.
slight nods to continuity, that have exploded in a lot of speculation.
Whose ideas have it been to use Andros's cloak, to mention KO-35, and
the use of Wes Collin's TimeRed costume?
BK: Most of the tributes to the past come from Koichi and most of all Jackie Marchand. I do not attempt to know anywhere close to what they know. I support their interest in the franchise and let it unfold in the series as long as it works into our arc. So when it comes to these things, I do what any successful Executive does... Get out of the way.
HJU: We've noticed a lot of prop re-use over in S.P.D., so far. The
Blue Senturion, Space Ranger helmets, Deviot, Red Time Force Ranger
and etc. While some fans certainly appreciate these as nods to PR's
past. Others are growing concerned that these props are being re-used
carelessly and may ultimately damage the rich continuity that many
longtime fans remain very passionate about.
So my question is, when doing things like having a man dressed in a
cloak and wielding drill-esque weapon. (Both signatures of Red Space
Ranger Andros one of the most popular Rangers that isn't from the
original series.) Are they done with acknowledgement of the past in
mind and intended as treats for longtime fans? Or are they simply
convenient cost-cutting measures and fanboys need to go get a life?
BK: The truth or a lie? The lie... YES! We painstakingly layer in all references to the past to satisfy the true PR fans.
The truth: It's a little of both. Both Jackie and Koichi are very respectful of the past and acknowledgement there of... Some of the props and costumes are added in with intention of the tribute to past PR years. And we operate on such a low budget that some props are recycled. If we were to start fresh every year you would not like what we could deliver for the budget. Some recycling is mandatory. We try to populate the S.P.D, world with a rich look. Rich looks cost money. Greg and I were amazed at the CSI-type work you fans do to every frame of PR. We did not realize that something shown only shortly 7 years ago would be recognized. So, no apologies from this office. We're trying to give you fans the best show possible. It's the hard facts but it is what it is.
Nods naar de fans, yeah right...
www.rangerboard.com/showthread.php?t=58614
